|
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on
the bases of race and color, as well as national origin, sex,
and religion. Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more
employees, including state and local governments. It also
applies to employment agencies and to labor organizations, as
well as to the federal government.
It is unlawful to discriminate
against any employee or applicant for employment because of
his/her race or color in regard to hiring, termination,
promotion, compensation, job training, or any other term,
condition, or privilege of employment. Title VII also prohibits
employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about
abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals of certain
racial groups. Title VII prohibits both intentional
discrimination and neutral job policies that disproportionately
exclude minorities and that are not job related.
Equal employment opportunity
cannot be denied because of marriage to or association with an
individual of a different race; membership in or association
with ethnic based organizations or groups; or attendance or
participation in schools or places of worship generally
associated with certain minority groups.
Title VII violations include:
- Race-Related
Characteristics and Conditions
Discrimination on the basis of an immutable characteristic
associated with race, such as skin color, hair texture, or
certain facial features violates Title VII, even though not
all members of the race share the same characteristic. Title
VII also prohibits discrimination on the basis of a
condition that predominantly affects one race unless the
practice is job related and consistent with business
necessity. For example, since sickle cell anemia
predominantly occurs in African-Americans, a policy that
excludes individuals with sickle cell anemia must be job
related and consistent with business necessity. Similarly, a
"no-beard" employment policy may discriminate against
African-American men who have a predisposition to
pseudofolliculitis barbae (severe shaving bumps) unless the
policy is job related and consistent with business
necessity.
- Harassment
Harassment on the basis of race and/or color violates Title
VII. Ethnic slurs, racial "jokes," offensive or derogatory
comments, or other verbal or physical conduct based on an
individual's race/color constitutes unlawful harassment if
the conduct creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive
working environment or interferes with the individual's work
performance.
- Segregation and
Classification of Employees
Title VII is violated where employees who belong to a
protected group are segregated by physically isolating them
from other employees or from customer contact. In addition,
employers may not assign employees according to race or
color. For example, Title VII prohibits assigning primarily
African-Americans to predominantly African-American
establishments or geographic areas. It is also illegal to
exclude members of one group from particular positions or to
group or categorize employees or jobs so that certain jobs
are generally held by members of a certain protected group.
Coding applications/resumes to designate an applicant's
race, by either an employer or employment agency,
constitutes evidence of discrimination where people of a
certain race or color are excluded from employment or from
certain positions.
- Pre-Employment
Inquiries
Requesting pre-employment information that discloses or
tends to disclose an applicant's race strongly suggests that
race will be used unlawfully as a basis for hiring.
Therefore, if members of minority groups are excluded from
employment, the request for such pre-employment information
would likely constitute evidence of discrimination.
If an employer legitimately needs information about its
employees' or applicants' race for affirmative action
purposes and/or to track applicant flow, it may obtain
racial information and simultaneously guard against
discriminatory selection by using "tear-off sheets" for the
identification of an applicant's race. After the applicant
completes the application and the tear-off portion, the
employer separates the tear-off sheet from the application
and does not use it in the selection process.
It is also unlawful to retaliate
against an individual for opposing employment practices that
discriminate based on race or color, or for filing a
discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in any way
in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under Title VII.
Statistics
In fiscal year 2004, the EEOC
received 27,696 charges of race discrimination. The EEOC resolved
29,631 race charges in FY 2004, and recovered $61.1 million in
monetary benefits for charging parties and other aggrieved
individuals (not including monetary benefits obtained through
litigation). The EEOC has observed an increasing number of color
discrimination charges. Color bias filings have increased by
125% since the mid-1990s, from 413 in FY 1994 to 932 in FY 2004.

|
|
(c) 2007 Bobum Corp. All Rights Reserved.
No copyright claimed to government works.
This website makes no representation regarding the abilities or
qualifications of the advertisers on this website.
This website is not a substitute for a lawyer or law firm. If you
believe you have been treated wrongly in the workplace, you should
consult a licensed, qualified attorney. This website does not offer
legal advice.
|